<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Proposition 218</title>
 <link>http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/taxonomy/term/68%2C68</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Background on Proposition 218</title>
 <link>http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/propositions/proposition-218/background-proposition-218</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Proposition 218 came to the rescue of Proposition 13.&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/propositions/proposition-218/background-proposition-218&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;Read&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;&gt;&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/propositions/proposition-218">Proposition 218</category>
 <category domain="http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/tags/proposition-218">Proposition 218</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 13:02:04 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jmonma</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">34 at http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Arnold&#039;s Tax Hikes: Wrong and Illegal</title>
 <link>http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/california-commentary/arnolds-tax-hikes-wrong-and-illegal</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It is no surprise that fiscal conservatives in California are appalled at the breathtaking assault on taxpayers proposed by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger. Both activists and elected leaders -- usually Republicans -- have responded with either derision or laughter (with perhaps some expletives mixed in). &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/california-commentary/arnolds-tax-hikes-wrong-and-illegal&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;Read&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;&gt;&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/california-commentary">California Commentary</category>
 <category domain="http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/tags/california">California</category>
 <category domain="http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/tags/governor-schwarzenegger">Governor Schwarzenegger</category>
 <category domain="http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/tags/proposition-218">Proposition 218</category>
 <category domain="http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/tags/sales-tax">Sales Tax</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 19:37:15 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>gforster</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">128 at http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Scary Times Made Scarier By Property Tax Bills</title>
 <link>http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/california-commentary/scary-times-made-scarier-property-tax-bills</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;For many, these are scary economic times as the value of homes and investments declines. Adding to the anxiety, property tax bills are arriving in mail boxes across the state. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/california-commentary/scary-times-made-scarier-property-tax-bills&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;Read&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;&gt;&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/california-commentary">California Commentary</category>
 <category domain="http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/tags/assessment">Assessment</category>
 <category domain="http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/tags/california">California</category>
 <category domain="http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/tags/general-tax-levy">General Tax Levy</category>
 <category domain="http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/tags/property-tax">Property Tax</category>
 <category domain="http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/tags/proposition-218">Proposition 218</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:26:45 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>gforster</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">132 at http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>L.A. Overcharging for Water</title>
 <link>http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/california-commentary/la-overcharging-water</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Koko the gorilla, a resident of the Los Angeles Zoo, had become quite adept at picking the pockets of the zoo keeper. One day Koko used the zoo keeper&#039;s key to let himself out of his cage, and ambled over to the snack shop. Climbing onto a bar stool, he grunted &quot;Water.&quot; When the man returned with a bottle of Aquafina, Koko handed him a $20 bill from the zoo keeper&#039;s wallet. Guessing the gorilla wasn&#039;t too smart, the man gave Koko one dollar in change. &quot;We don&#039;t get a lot of business from the animals here,&quot; the man remarked. Koko snorted, &quot;At $19 for bottled water, I&#039;m not surprised.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Koko is not the only Los Angeles resident paying too much for water. And the snack shop isn&#039;t the only water purveyor hoping that its customers aren&#039;t too smart. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/california-commentary/la-overcharging-water&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;Read&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;&gt;&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/california-commentary">California Commentary</category>
 <category domain="http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/tags/court-cases">Court Cases</category>
 <category domain="http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/tags/los-angeles">Los Angeles</category>
 <category domain="http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/tags/proposition-218">Proposition 218</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 17:01:23 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>gforster</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">353 at http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>No Tears for L.A.</title>
 <link>http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/california-commentary/no-tears-la</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The city of Los Angeles has been caught with its hand in the cookie jar. The city&#039;s hands are experienced at this maneuver, but they don&#039;t usually get caught. In this case, the California Court of Appeal has ruled that the city broke the law by imposing a tax increase on cell phone use that did not receive approval of voters. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/california-commentary/no-tears-la&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;Read&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;&gt;&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/california-commentary">California Commentary</category>
 <category domain="http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/tags/los-angeles">Los Angeles</category>
 <category domain="http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/tags/proposition-218">Proposition 218</category>
 <category domain="http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/tags/tax-increase">Tax Increase</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 18:01:13 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>gforster</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">375 at http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Closing the Assessment Loophole in Proposition 13</title>
 <link>http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/propositions/proposition-218/closing-assessment-loophole-proposition-13</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Proposition 13 could be rendered meaningless if Proposition 218 fails at the polls.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Consider: Proposition 13 is a law designed chiefly to protect property taxpayers. It put limits on how high and how fast property taxes can climb and requires a vote of the people on new local taxes. After Prop 13&#039;s success, bureaucrats looked for ways to raise revenues while avoiding Prop 13&#039;s restrictions. They hit upon assessment districts, which were historically used to fund capital improvements that directly benefited property. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/propositions/proposition-218/closing-assessment-loophole-proposition-13&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;Read&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;&gt;&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/propositions/proposition-218">Proposition 218</category>
 <category domain="http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/tags/assessment">Assessment</category>
 <category domain="http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/tags/proposition-218">Proposition 218</category>
 <category domain="http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/tags/tax-increase">Tax Increase</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 20:06:24 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jmonma</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">60 at http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Big Court Win for Taxpayers: Proposition 218 Means What It Says</title>
 <link>http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/california-commentary/big-court-win-taxpayers-proposition-218-means-what-it-says</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Although it received very little press attention, taxpayers recently won a huge victory in the California Supreme Court. The ruling in &lt;em&gt;Bighorn-Desert View Water Agency v. Beringson&lt;/em&gt; has created shockwaves throughout the state among those concerned with local taxation. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/california-commentary/big-court-win-taxpayers-proposition-218-means-what-it-says&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;Read&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;&gt;&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/california-commentary">California Commentary</category>
 <category domain="http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/tags/court-cases">Court Cases</category>
 <category domain="http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/tags/proposition-13">Proposition 13</category>
 <category domain="http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/tags/proposition-218">Proposition 218</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2006 13:54:53 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jon Coupal</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">223 at http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Text of Proposition 218 with Analysis</title>
 <link>http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/propositions/proposition-218/text-proposition-218-analysis</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Right To Vote On Taxes Act&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;small&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Statement of Drafters&#039; Intent&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, January 1997&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SECTION 1. TITLE. This Act shall be known and may be cited as the &quot;Right to Vote on Taxes Act.&quot; &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/propositions/proposition-218/text-proposition-218-analysis&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;Read&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;&gt;&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/propositions/proposition-218">Proposition 218</category>
 <category domain="http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/tags/assessment">Assessment</category>
 <category domain="http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/tags/local-taxes">Local Taxes</category>
 <category domain="http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/tags/parcel-taxes">Parcel Taxes</category>
 <category domain="http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/tags/proposition-218">Proposition 218</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 May 2006 18:15:26 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jmonma</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">76 at http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Water Rates Under Proposition 218</title>
 <link>http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/propositions/proposition-218/water-rates-under-proposition-218</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The September 1997 issue of &lt;em&gt;Debt Line&lt;/em&gt; reported on an Attorney General opinion which concluded that water service was not &quot;property&lt;br /&gt;
related&quot; for purposes of Article XIIID of the California Constitution (Proposition 218). Such an interpretation, if adopted by the courts, would permit local governments to impose water rates in a manner that deviates from the important &quot;costs of service&quot; requirements mandated by the new law, as well as depriving California taxpayers of significant procedural protections. &lt;span class=&#039;read-more&#039;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/propositions/proposition-218/water-rates-under-proposition-218&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;Read&amp;nbsp;more&amp;nbsp;&gt;&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/propositions/proposition-218">Proposition 218</category>
 <category domain="http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com/tags/proposition-218">Proposition 218</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2006 18:28:34 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jmonma</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">77 at http://hjtadev.opencirclelabs.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

